Andre A. Kulisz

 

Natural health doctor Tulsa, naturopathic doctor Tulsa, alternative medicine Tulsa, European Natural Health Center USA, alternative therapy USA, natural medicine USA, support in chronic and catastrophic conditions, hormone replacement, weight loss, smoking cessation, consultations worldwide.

European Natural Health Center

Imagine Health.  Naturally.

 

Tommie Dahlmann

Home

About Us

Restore Health America Program

On-line Medical Dictionary

Health Assessment Questionnaire

Health Links

Scheduled Events

List of Seminars and Lectures

Disclaimer

Wersja Polska

Ingredients to AVOID in cosmetics and personal care products | Dr. Simoncini cancer treatment with sodium bicarbonate | Big Bucks, Big Pharma

List & Labels of FDA-Approved Vaccines |  Vaccine Reactions Reporting | Why Chitos and Poptarts list their ingredients and vaccines not?

No science, no cures - sickness mongering  |  Physician-Pharma Financial Ties

 

Doctors Fast to Interrupt Patients' Concerns

The Journal of the American Medical Association January 20, 1999;281:283-287.  

When it comes to a doctor's visit, the patient has an average of 23 seconds to state their concerns before a physician interrupts. Overall, only 28% of doctors know their patient's full spectrum of concerns before they begin to focus on one particular concern, and once the conversation is focused, the likelihood of returning to other concerns is only 8%. Physicians commonly redirect and focus clinical interviews before giving patients the opportunity to complete their statement of concerns. The problem is that the conversation rarely veers back to other concerns the patient might have, often leaving patients with the feeling they may not have discussed all their problems or even the most important one.

If the physician doesn't actively ask if all the points have been covered, patients tend to have more "doorknob" questions -- that is, they bring up an important problem just as they are leaving the office. The good news is that patients need only slightly more than 23 seconds to state their problems. Most people have 2 to 3 things they want to discuss with their doctor, and if given the chance, raise those issues in an average of 32 seconds. Our findings show that if those concerns are clarified at the beginning, you are less likely to have late-arising concerns, therefore the visits are more efficient and on average, the agenda setting portion of the interview takes about half a minute.

The best thing (for patients to do) is to prepare before the office visit, write down their concerns, so that when they get in to see the doctor they are able to verbalize very clearly and at the beginning what their concerns are. The researchers found that 75% of physicians elicited patient concerns, that is, they asked questions such as "How can I help you?" or "What brings you here today?" When a physician did not ask such questions, 35% of patients had late-arising questions, compared with 15% of cases in which the doctor did ask such questions. It's infrequent that the doctor asks if there are other concerns before they -- in my opinion -- prematurely start to delve into the first concern stated. So by keeping the agenda open a little longer and saying what else do we need to address today, it allows the doctor and the patients to plan the office visit to be more efficient and effective.

The Journal of the American Medical Association January 20, 1999;281:283-287.

 

Home  Practice & Appointments  Services  Health Assessment Questionnaire  Literature  General Information  Health Links  Disclaimer

Email   Tel. +1-918-398-0252, Fax +1-661-459-2329, 7116 S. Mingo Rd., Suite 101, Tulsa, OK 74133, USA

 

This website, the information contained herein and/or nutritional products/formulations represented are not drugs as defined by the US Government and as such are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, mitigate or prevent any disease.   Use of this website signifies acknowledgement and agreement with this disclaimer.  For the full disclaimer click here.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material, the use of which, has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of health, environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Hit Counter

Revised: July 27, 2010 07:24 -0500, All Rights Reserved (c) Kulisz & Dahlmann, 2002 - 2010